Veterans Awaken To Role As Corporate Mercenaries

When I was younger, I thought going into the military was the right thing to do and I joined voluntarily.

I saw it as an adventure and I was anxious to jump in and learn what 'being a man' was all about. Like Hemingway's fictional alter ego, Nick Adams in The Sun Also Rises, I wanted to get into the game and experience life to the hilt. Not unlike Nick Adams in the final chapter of the book, I also came to see things very differently on the far side of the journey. 

During the Vietnam era, I had a very low opinion of draft dodgers, draft card burners, and war protesters in general. I assumed they were mostly spoiled and cowardly college wimps who were too good to get their hands dirty giving something back to their country and were mostly looking for an easy pretext to meet women. But I was naive and wholly ignorant of what was really taking place. 

More importantly, I had no idea who was manipulating these events from behind the scenes. I unthinkingly accepted the cover story that it was those Godless communists who were agitating to take over all of Asia and they had to be stopped at all costs.

I was brainwashed. 

Baby Go Boom

"....at 2:50 pm, more than half the runners were through...." 

[Explosion] The first bomb explodes. 

"...breaking news from Canada. Police say they've broken up an Al-Qaeda-linked terrorist attack that was aimed to disrupt a major North American transportation route...." 

"...a sharp new warning of all-out war. For the first time, the mysterious and secretive nation has threatened a preemptive nuclear strike against the US..."

"...in Europe, Spain is also feeling the economic pinch. One in four are now currently unemployed in that country, and the EU expects that number to climb even higher...." 

"...China and neighboring countries are mobilizing resources to fight off a new strain of bird flu...." 

"...hospitals in a race against time to contain nightmare super bacteria before it spreads from the hospital out into the world...."

If you watch the news these days, there seems to be a lot to be concerned about.

Burzynski The Movie

Burzynski the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who has discovered the genetic mechanism that can cure most human cancers. Dr Burzynski won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.

One thing for sure, Cancer is big business.

Watch as the FDA and it's incestuous relationship with Big Pharma, seek to first discredit, then co-opt Burzynski's discovery.

As you glimpse into the corrupt government intricacies of the current Empire… where disease treatment is big serious oligopoly and all others must be shut out.

And people suffer...

...the opening 30 minutes of this film is designed to thoroughly establish this fact—so the viewer can fully appreciate the events that follow it.

House of Numbers

The other night I watched, 8: The Mormon Proposition. It’s a hard-hitting exposé of a shameful episode brought on by the Mormon Church.

Tonight I watched a much different documentary, House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, which is a new film about Aids. It follows one young film maker as he discovers the ‘real’ science behind HIV. It discovers the reality of the antiretroviral drugs themselves causing the symptoms called Aids.

The HIV/ AIDS Story is Being Rewritten

House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, is an AIDS film like no other.

This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom regarding HIV/AIDS is based. House of Numbers could well be the opening volley in a battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic gone awry.

The Museum of Human Atrocities

(NaturalNews) What's most striking about the present BP oil catastrophe is not that it is an aberration but rather part of a dangerous pattern of mankind's propensity to destroy nature. To destroy life in a large region of an ocean isn't even new: The world already has over two hundred "dead zones" where fish can't live because the ocean water has no more oxygen left thanks to the runoff effects of man-made chemicals.

Not content with mere deforestation and the vast destruction of biodiversity on land, Man has now expanded to destroy the oceans through overfishing, ocean acidification from CO2 emissions, agricultural runoff, flushing pharmaceuticals down the drain and unleashing crude oil directly into the ocean waters. It almost seems as if mankind were somehow bent on destroying itself by first destroying everything else on the planet just to see what happens.

Phoenix Aquua Detoxifies Craigslist

“Phoenix Aquua detoxifies a ton of racist garbage and makes us less sick" “With so much small minded bigotry on CL - it is refreshing to read a commentary that is intelligent and lovingly wise !” —Alan Scott

One of many comments I received from readers of a commentary I posted on Craiglist, under the /rant and raves section.

I had the unfortunate displeasure of coming across this section of Arizona's Craigslist, and  I made the mistake of reading some of the posts

The venomous hatred inbred into each posting made it difficult for me to stomach.

After visiting quite a few different cities /rants sections, I soon realized that this was a wide spread mentallity among the CL readership, and a direct reflection of most americans state of mind.

Generation Rx

Not long ago, while reading through the pages of the New York Times, I came upon an article that really grabbed me, not because it was about some new horror abroad or another political debacle at home, but rather because it limned so cleanly the way American lives are changing. It was a story in the paper’s “house and home” section about the rise in popularity of the “triple-wide” medicine cabinets.

As the Times put it,

“First there were French fries. Then there were sport utility vehicles. Now even the most private of domestic preserves, the medicine cabinet, has been supersized. With the sales of lotions, potions, ‘nutraceuticals’ and pharmaceuticals climbing to new heights, manufactures are responding with medicine cabinets that are taller, wider and deeper than ever before.”

The article included photographs of the classic bathroom cabinet – the tiny stained wall hanger that most ofus grew up with –and a slew of the new breed: the “floor-to-ceiling,” the “walk-in” the “super-deep and super wide.” There were cabinets with built-in defoggers andother hinged with fancy rubber gaskets so that they don’t go “click” when one doesn’t want them to go click. The designer’s ingenuity was stunning, the new owners’ justifications for their triple-wides quirky or peevish. “He’s obsessed with muscle power pills!” complained one woman of her husband’s quest for more medicine chest space.

Everybody wanted bigger ones, better ones.

This movie is about the products taking up an increasingly huge and expensive chuck of space in that American medicine chest: prescription drugs. Unlike potions and lotions for one’s skin and hair, they are not products that we “decide” we want. Prescription drugs are products that highly educated people, whom we trust with our money and our lives, tell us that we need in order to survive or to avoid undue risk to our health.

Over the past decade the use of these drugs, almost all for chronic diseases, has soared. The average number of prescriptions per person, annually, in 1993 was seven. The average number of prescriptions per person, annually, in 2000 was eleven. In 2004, it was twelve. The total number of annual prescriptions in the United States now stands at about 3 billion. The cost per year? About 180 billion, headed to an estimated 414 billion next year, 2011.

There’s another number to consider: In 2004, almost half of all Americans used at least one prescription drug on a daily basis, amazingly, about 3 our of 6 are children.

Another documentary showing us how wonderful the world we live in, and how it’s run by a group of very powerful and rich people. It tells the story of the high risk of prescribed drugs, and more importantly, reveals the people who run these companies and how they are all entangled and conflicting directly with rules and ethics. Like I always say, do your research.

To counter their evil we need to get to the root of the evil first.

At the very least this movie raises a lot of good questions. The number of people on prescription meds in the world right now is astounding. How did we ever get by for the thousands of years of human history without these drugs when we are now finding as many as one in three school kids needing to be medicated. Is it depression or boredom? is it Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or an active child's mind not being challenged and engaged? Long term side-effects? Increased tendencies towards suicide.

For decades, scores of doctors, government officials, journalists, and others have extolled the benefits of psychiatric medicines for children. GenerationRx presents "the rest of the story" and unveils how this era of unprecedented change in Western culture really occurred - and what price has been paid by our society.

On the streets they’re pushed…but in thousands of schools for millions of kids – they’re prescribed.

The biggest shock for me came when I realized how deep and pervasive the conflicts-of-interest really are. There is one scene in the film that really underscores the depths of the problem. It involves a prominent FDA official who helped to cover-up the side effects of Prozac — a man who also approved SSRI drugs for kids — and how his actions directly effected a friend of his own family. That scene still gives me the chills each time I watch it.

The film very clearly lays out that we have allowed psychiatry — the least scientific of all of medicine — to sidestep the bounds of what the FDA calls “safe and effective.” We have numbed too many of our young Galileo’s with these powerful drugs without concern for the long-term effects, and as a result, we’ve seen thousands of children committing violent acts and suicides, just for starters.

The worst part of this is that one of the side effects of Ritalin and the stimulant medicines, for example, is the very real possibility that a child or teen will have a psychotic reaction. If a kid gets a psychotic reaction, then doctors and psychiatrists often use this as an opportunity to label the kid as bipolar.

Once they’re labeled bipolar, they prescribed antipsychotics for life! These drugs are being used far too cavalierly. It is both unethical and immoral — and needs to be stopped.

Considering the trend, we are going to see our future leaders on these drugs if we don’t recognize the folly of our ways. The rampant overuse of these drugs must be reversed or we face a frightening prospect.

I recently brought my dog to the vet for chewing of her paws, and immediately she was prescribed Prozac.  After I researched the effficacy of Prozac, I quickly came to the understanding that this is a harmful drug and decided to make an intelligent decision to not put my dog on it.  Today, she has overcome the chewing...all I did was give her a little more attention and love.

Definitely a film that every parent should see.

Related Articles

Watch Now - Generation Rx
Big Pharma Researcher Pleads Guilty to Fraud
Addicting Congress
Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging
Bayer Exposed (HIV Contaminated Vaccine)

Tainted Baxter Vaccine Sent to 18 Countries

Is Big Pharma Trying to Kill Us?

Toronto Sun News

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses.  Officials of the World Health Organization -European operation, said the body is closely monitoring the investigation into the events that took place at Baxter International’s research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria.

“At this juncture we are confident in saying that public health and occupational risk is minimal at present,” -Medical Officer Roberta Andraghetti, Copenhagen, Denmark

But what remains unanswered are the circumstances surrounding the incident in the Baxter facility in Orth-Donau.  The contaminated product, a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and unlabelled H5N1 viruses, was supplied to an Austrian research company. The Austrian firm, Avir Green Hills Biotechnology, then sent portions of it to sub-contractors in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany.

The contamination incident, which is being investigated by the four European countries, came to light when the subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets with the product and they died. Ferrets shouldn’t die from exposure to human H3N2 flu viruses.

Public health authorities concerned about what has been described as a “serious error” on Baxter’s part have assumed the death of the ferrets meant the H5N1 virus in the product was live. But the company, Baxter International Inc., has been parsimonious about the amount of information it has released about the event.  On Friday, the company’s director of global bioscience communications confirmed what scientists have suspected.

“It was live,” Christopher Bona said in an email.

The contaminated product, which Baxter calls “experimental virus material,” was made at the Orth-Donau research facility. Baxter makes its flu vaccine — including a human H5N1 vaccine for which a licence is expected shortly — at a facility in the Czech Republic.

People familiar with biosecurity rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted.

Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences. While H5N1 doesn’t easily infect people, H3N2 viruses do. If someone exposed to a mixture of the two had been simultaneously infected with both strains, he or she could have served as an incubator for a hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people.

That mixing process, called reassortment, is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created. There is no suggestion that happened because of this accident, however.

“We have no evidence of any reassortment, that any reassortment may have occurred,”   “And we have no evidence of any increased transmissibility of the viruses that were involved in the experiment with the ferrets in the Czech Republic.” - said Andraghetti

Baxter hasn’t shed much light — at least not publicly — on how the accident happened. Earlier this week Bona called the mistake the result of a combination of “just the process itself, (and) technical and human error in this procedure. He said he couldn’t reveal more information because it would give away proprietary information about Baxter’s production process.

Friday the four investigating governments are co-operating closely with the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Control in Stockholm, Sweden.

“We are in very close contact with Austrian authorities to understand what the circumstances of the incident in their laboratory were,”

“And the reason for us wishing to know what has happened is to prevent similar events in the future and to share lessons that can be learned from this event with others to prevent similar events. ... This is very important.” -Andraghetti said  

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses.  An official of the World Health Organization’s European operation said the body is closely monitoring the investigation into the events that took place at Baxter International’s research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria. 

“At this juncture we are confident in saying that public health and occupational risk is minimal at present,” “But what remains unanswered are the circumstances surrounding the incident in the Baxter facility in Orth-Donau.” Medical Officer Roberta Andraghetti said from Copenhagen, Denmark. 

The contaminated product, a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and unlabelled H5N1 viruses, was supplied to an Austrian research company. The Austrian firm, Avir Green Hills Biotechnology, then sent portions of it to sub-contractors in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany.

The contamination incident, which is being investigated by the four European countries, came to light when the subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets with the product and they died. Ferrets shouldn’t die from exposure to human H3N2 flu viruses.  Public health authorities concerned about what has been described as a “serious error” on Baxter’s part have assumed the death of the ferrets meant the H5N1 virus in the product was live. But the company, Baxter International Inc., has been parsimonious about the amount of information it has released about the event.

Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor writes in Vaccines as Biological Weapons? Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries : 

Deerfield, Illinois-based pharmaceutical company Baxter International Inc. has just been caught shipping live avian flu viruses mixed with vaccine material to medical distributors in 18 countries. The “mistake” (if you can call it that, see below…) was discovered by the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. The World Health Organization was alerted and panic spread throughout the vaccine community as health experts asked the obvious question: How could this have happened?

Or, put another way, Baxter is acting a whole lot like a biological terrorism organization these days, sending deadly viral samples around the world. If you mail an envelope full of anthrax to your Senator, you get arrested as a terrorist. So why is Baxter — which mailed samples of a far more deadly viral strain to labs around the world — getting away with saying, essentially, “Oops?” But there’s a bigger question in all this:

How could this company have accidentally mixed LIVE avian flu viruses (both H5N1 and H3N2, the human form) in this vaccine material?

Was the viral contamination intentional? 

The shocking answer is that this couldn’t have been an accident. Why? Because Baxter International adheres to something called BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) – a set of laboratory safety protocols that prevent the cross-contamination of materials.

“Laboratory personnel have specific training in handling pathogenic and potentially lethal agents, and are supervised by competent scientists who are experienced in working with these agents. This is considered a neutral or warm zone. All procedures involving the manipulation of infectious materials are conducted within biological safety cabinets or other physical containment devices, or by personnel wearing appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment. The laboratory has special engineering and design features.”

It is bad enough that governments all over the world have been warning about the likely pandemic flu. Now we find out we cannot trust Big Pharma to handle such bio-hazardous material in a safe manner. Who knows whether it was intentional?  But I sure would like to know what really happened?  And I sure would like to see the people responsible fired! Paul J. Watson adds in ‘Accidental’ Contamination Of Vaccine With Live Avian Flu Virus Virtually Impossible :

Czech newspapers are questioning if the shocking discovery of vaccines contaminated with the deadly avian flu virus which were distributed to 18 countries by the American company Baxter were part of a conspiracy to provoke a pandemic. The claim holds weight because, according to the very laboratory protocols that are routine for vaccine makers, mixing a live virus biological weapon with vaccine material by accident is virtually impossible.

“The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses,” reports the Canadian Press

Baxter flu vaccines contaminated with H5N1 – otherwise known as the human form of avian flu, one of the most deadly biological weapons on earth with a 60% kill rate – were received by labs in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Slovenia.

Initially, Baxter attempted to stonewall questions by invoking “trade secrets” and refused to reveal how the vaccines were contaminated with H5N1. After increased pressure they then claimed that pure H5N1 batches were sent by accident. This was seemingly an attempt to quickly change the story and hide the fact that the accidental contamination of a vaccine with a deadly biological agent like avian flu is virtually impossible and the only way it could have happened was by wilful gross criminal negligence. [source]

According to a compiled translation from Czech newspaper stories, the media over there is asking tough questions about whether the contamination was part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic.

"Was this just a criminal negligence or it was an attempt to provoke pandemia using vaccination against flu to spread the disease – as happened with the anti-B hepatitis vaccination with vaccines containing the HIV virus in US? – and then cash for the vaccines against H5N1 which Baxter develops? How could on Earth a virus as H5N1 come to the ordinary flu vaccines? Don’t they follow even basic precautions in the american pharma companies?” states the translation.

The fact that Baxter mixed the deadly H5N1 virus with a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses is the smoking gun. The H5N1 virus on its own has killed hundreds of people, but it is less airborne and more restricted in the ease with which it can spread. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which as everyone knows are super-airborne and easily spread, the effect is a potent, super-airbone, super deadly biological weapon.

Spreading bird flu would create an instantaneous surge of demand for bird flu vaccines. The profits that vaccine companies such as Baxter International could reap out of such a panic are astronomical.  In addition, as we have previously reported, those that have a stake in the Tamiflu vaccine include top globalists and BIlderberg members like George Shultz, Lodewijk J.R. de Vink and former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Authorities in both Europe and the U.S. have openly detailed plans for martial law, quarantine and internment should a bird flu pandemic occur.

The other motivation, as we have exhaustively documented on this website for years, is the fact that elites throughout history have openly stated that they want to see a world population reduction of around 80 per cent. Shocking stories like this take the plausibility of that narrative out of the realms of conspiracy theory and into the dangerous reality of conspiracy fact.

This is not the first time that vaccine companies have been caught distributing vaccines contaminated with deadly viruses. In 2006 it was revealed that Bayer Corporation had discovered that their injection drug, which was used by hemophiliacs, was contaminated with the HIV virus. Internal documents prove that after they positively knew that the drug was contaminated, they took it off the U.S. market only to dump it on the European, Asian and Latin American markets, knowingly exposing thousands, most of them children, to the live HIV virus. Government officials in France went to prison for allowing the drug to be distributed. The documents show that the FDA colluded with Bayer to cover-up the scandal and allowed the deadly drug to be distributed globally. No Bayer executives ever faced arrest or prosecution in the United States. [source]

Let's not forget -

Related Articles

Bayer Exposed (HIV Contaminated Vaccine)

Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging

Pneumonic Plague H1N1 Ukranian Outbreak

H1N1, Swine Flu Probes False Pandemic

Big Pharma Researcher Pleads Guilty to Fraud

Run from the Cure - Hemp Medicine

A Dirty Health Care Bill - Blame Obama

America seems to blame the Senators for the unforgivably weak health care bill that’s about to pass, the one that’s laden with insurance company giveaways and devoid of nearly any meaningful attempt to rein in the morally disgusting practices of the industry. And make no mistake: Lieberman is a corporate cheerleader, on his knees in the locker room delivering a big sloppy, ball-lickin’ bj to Big Pharma and the health insurance companies. But I don’t blame him — I blame President Obama and his failure to lead.

This bill is a dog, a gift-wrapped Christmas present for the health insurance companies. It is most certainly not health care reform; hell, it isn’t even insurance reform.

Think it ain’t so? Take it from Wendell Potter, the former CIGNA executive-turned-whistleblower whose conscience eventually forced him to battle the insurance industry practices he once enforced. When asked by Keith Olbermann if he considered the bill a bailout for insurance companies, Potter replied that “It certainly is. It contains everything the industry wants, and it’s been stripped of things that the industry didn’t like, so it absolutely is a big gift, a big bailout to the industry.”

Should you wild out? Well, yeah, if you give a shit about reforming health care in any credible way, you should be screaming WHAT THE FUCK. It’s extremely revealing that the White House has taken aim at Howard Dean for telling it like it is. Think about that—they’re not mad at Lieberman…they’re mad at Dean. But Lieberman ruined our chance of getting the public option, right? And yet the White House has been directing it’s ire at Dean…Dean, who actually has the nerve to point out that, dare I say it, the Obama administration is slathering lipstick all over a pig here.

It seems like this is the bill the Obama White House wanted all along. By making some half-assed effort at a public option, the President could appear to be a man of the people. By stopping short of demanding it, he could still hook up the corporate interests he is apparently beholden to. Lieberman seems like more of a fall guy here than anything, someone who did what the administration secretly wanted to do, but publicly couldn’t.

So now we’re legally forced to purchase insurance, by law, from the same asshole insurance companies (Blue Cross, Aetna, CIGNA, etc.) whose bullshit policies didn’t cover people very well, and that we couldn’t afford to begin with. Oh, and they still get to keep their anti-trust exemption. Wow, thanks for the reform guys. Can you do the college football national championship next?

It’s easy to get riled up over Lieberman’s one-man show, and focus on him as the reason we just blew the best chance for meaningful reform in decades. But the real fault lies with President Obama. He showed a lack of leadership on this from the start. By not actually defining what he wanted to see in the bill, he’s now able to CLAIM that he got a win when this fetid piece of garbage passes.

Sure — if you never take a stand for anything specific, you can never really be said to lose. When asked if a public option was a requirement for him, he waffled and equivocated, and, to put it bluntly, acted like a pussy. If he’d said it from the start, and made it clear it was important to him and there would be fucking consequences for those who opposed this, it might have gone better for him. Instead he was wishy-washy and lukewarm, and the House and Senate correctly interpreted that to mean the public option wasn’t very important to him.

This is hard to say coming from someone who thinks George Bush was an amoral, murderous vampire/lich whose hands are dripping with a gooey mixture of crude oil and the blood of the innocent, but he showed more leadership ability, in many regards. He led the country in exactly the wrong way almost every time, sure, but still: Bush never had 60 Senators, and somehow he managed to ram through all his idiotic ideas, like that classic that allows more arsenic in our drinking water.

It could be argued that Republicans have more of a herd mentality, and that there is far more diversity of thought and opinion among the Democrats—therefore they are a tougher group to cajole into voting together, as a unit. That’s partly true, though the GOP is increasingly fractured. But the bill about to be passed amounts to a Playboy centerfold, one that insurance executives are currently beating off to.

Today we are educated to the fact that cigarette smoking is bad for our health and has been directly linked to cancer.  We are also educated to the effects of second hand smoke, and how it affects our children. How can  people follow a leader that clearly has no regard for his own health, but will dictate what we should do about our health? 

And, much as it pains me to write it, we have Barack Obama’s utter failure of leadership to thank for that.

Related Articles

Addicting Congress

Milk Does noBODY Good

H1N1 Hoax Falls Apart

Gardasil Vaccine Deception

Flouride Poisoning Revealed

Gardasil Vaccine Deception

THE NZ MINISTRY OF HEALTH IGNORED THE WARNINGS OF ITS OWN DIRECTOR OF GARDASIL CLINICAL TRIALS

Julie Smith, researcher and founder of a NZ website set up specifically to give information about the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, says concerned parents have been contacting her wanting to know how they can help to have the vaccine withdrawn from NZ. [continue reading]

Ms Smith says “Many more parents are making the connection to their child’s sudden onset of deteriorating health since receiving the Gardasil vaccine.” 

“What is now happening to our girls here in New Zealand is replicating what has already happened overseas. It was only a matter of time before girls here were going to die from this vaccine,” said Ms Smith.

When Dr Diane Harper, the woman who designed and conducted the clinical trials for Gardasil, asked our government to take a wait and see approach to this vaccine, why did our MoH not heed her advice? Why, when Dr Harper asked the MoH not to promote Gardasil as a ‘cervical cancer vaccine’ because, in her words, this is simply not true, did the Ministry of Health ignore her request?

“These are just two of the many questions Miss Smith says should be put to the Ministry of Health.” 

According to the research Ms Smith has discovered, ninety eight per cent of all women can rid their bodies of human papilloma viruses thanks to the action of their own immune system, and of those two per cent who can’t the National Cervical Smear programme will usually detect any pre-cancerous cell changes so they can be treated before cancer develops.

Girls and young women have no real health advantage by being vaccinated with Gardasil.  However, it is apparent from the many reports here and overseas, of serious adverse reactions to the vaccine, that they do place their health at risk by having this vaccine, Smith maintains.[source]

For the last several years, HPV vaccines have been marketed to the public and mandated in compulsory injections for young girls in several states based on the idea that they prevent cervical cancer. Now, NaturalNews has obtained documents from the FDA and other sources (see below) which reveal that the FDA has been well aware for several years that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has no direct link to cervical cancer.

NaturalNews has also learned that HPV vaccines have been proven to be flatly worthless in clearing the HPV virus from women who have already been exposed to HPV (which includes most sexually active women), furthermore, this story reveals evidence that the vaccine currently being administered for HPV -- Gardasil -- may increase the risk of precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6 percent in some women. The vaccine, it turns out, may be far more dangerous to the health of women than doing nothing at all.

If true, this information reveals details of an enormous public health fraud being perpetrated on the American people, involving FDA officials, Big Pharma promoters, and even the governors of states like Texas.

This report reveals startling facts about the HPV vaccine that most people will find shocking. [continue reading]

For more than 20 years, the FDA had regulated the HPV test as a "test for cervical cancer." But since at least 2003, the FDA has changed its position on the relationship between Human Papilloma Virus and cervical cancer, stating that the HPV strain is "not associated with cervical cancer."

A company that manufacturers a DNA testing device that can detect the presence of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) is petitioning the FDA (and suing the FDA) to get it to reclassify its medical device as a "Class II" device based on the revelation that the FDA has already adopted the position that HPV infections do not directly cause cervical cancer.

This would mean that the FDA has been aware for years that HPV does not cause cervical cancer, which means that the FDA's approval of the Gardasil vaccine -- as well as the national push for Gardasil vaccinations -- is based on a grand medical hoax that, not surprisingly, appears to be designed to exploit the fear of cancer to sell vaccines. The victims in all this, of course, are the young girls who are apparently being subjected to a medically useless (and potentially dangerous) vaccine. [continue reading]

The FDA news release of March 31, 2003 acknowledges that "most infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer", in recognition of the advances in medical science and technology since 1988. In other words, since 2003 the scientific staff of the FDA no longer considers HPV infection to be a high-risk disease when writing educational materials for the general public whereas the regulatory arm of the agency is still bound by the old classification scheme that had placed HPV test as a test to stratify risk for cervical cancer in regulating the industry.

In it, the FDA says, "The HPV DNA test is not intended to substitute for regular Pap screening. Nor is it intended to screen women under 30 who have normal Pap tests. Although the rate of HPV infection in this group is high, most infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer." (Emphasis added)

In other words, the FDA knew in 2003 that HPV infections are not associated with cervical cancer.

As the reclassification petition reveals, HPV infections are naturally self-limiting -- meaning that they are controlled naturally, without requiring intervention with drugs or vaccines. It is not the HPV virus itself that causes cervical cancer but rather a persistent state of ill-health on the part of the patient that makes her vulnerable to persistent infections.

Based on new scientific information published in the past 15 years, it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV infection does not bear a direct relationship to stratification of the risk for cervical cancer . Most acute infections caused by HPV are self-limiting...Repeated sequential transient HPV infections, even when caused by "high-risk" HPVs, are characteristically not associated with high risk of developing squamous intraepithelial lesions, a precursor of cervical cancer.

A woman found to be positive for the same strain (genotype) of HPV on repeated testing is highly likely suffering from a persistent HPV infection and is considered to be at high risk of developing precancerous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix . It is the persistent infection, not the virus, that determines the cancer risk.

The FDA agrees with this assessment of the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, as evidenced by its 2003 news release quoted above.

Next, we reveal evidence that HPV vaccines actually cause precancerous lesions in women. HPV Vaccines Increase the Risk of Precancerous Lesions.[continue reading]

This revelation should be quite shocking to anyone who has been following the debate over Gardasil and mandatory vaccinations of teenage girls. First, it reveals that Gardasil appears to increase disease by 44.6 percent in certain people -- namely, those who were already carriers of the same HPV strains used in the vaccine.

In other words, it appears that if the vaccine is given to a young woman who already carries HPV in a "harmless" state, it may "activate" the infection and directly cause precancerous lesions to appear. The vaccine, in other words, may accelerate the development of precancerous lesions in women.

The FDA directly admits the vaccine is utterly useless in these women, stating in the same document, "Finally, there is compelling evidence that the vaccine lacks therapeutic efficacy among women who have had prior exposure to HPV and have not cleared previous infection (PCR positive and seropositive)."

There are also serious questions about the safety of the vaccine for non-sexually-active young women. Yet even if the vaccine poses no increased risk of cervical cancer for non-sexually-active young girls, there's still the more serious question of: Does the vaccine work? Does it really prevent cervical cancer in the first place? And that question has already been clearly answered by the FDA's own admission that HPV infections are not the cause of cervical cancer in the first place.

This is hardly a position from which to mandate the vaccine for everyone, especially since the vaccine has been widely prescribed as "completely safe" for everyone. It is widely claimed by medical authorities that the vaccine has no downside: No health risks, no increased risk of disease and no potential to cause harm in women. Clearly, these assumptions have no basis in scientific fact.

Keep in mind, too, that Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has publicly suggested that young boys should receive Gardasil vaccinations! Why? Because they might engage in oral sex with girls who carry the virus. Therefore, the story goes, young boys should be vaccinated against this virus that they claim causes cervical cancer! (Never mind the fact that boys don't have a cervix...) There is no end, it seems, to the pseudoscientific nonsense that will be spouted in an effort to sell more Garsasil vaccines to people who don't need them.

To further investigate this conclusion, NaturalNews took a closer look at research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (August, 2007), entitled, "Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection"[source]

In other words, the authors found no evidence that the vaccine worked at all. This observation led the authors to offer this damning conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing more than a grand medical hoax:

It is difficult to take an honest look at this scientific evidence and the statements made by the FDA and not come to the conclusion that mandatory Gardasil vaccination policies being pushed across U.S. states right now are based on something other than science.

There are many theories exploring the motivation for such vaccination policies. Possible theories include:

Financial benefit: Big Pharma is pushing mandatory Gardasil vaccination policies so that it can profit from selling more vaccines to the states. This idea is at least partially supported by the fact that the first state Governor to mandate such vaccines (Texas Gov. Rick Perry) had undisclosed ties to Big Pharma. (A top official in Perry's administration worked directly for Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil.)

Conspiracy to poison the people: This theory, which may stretch the bounds of belief in some readers, proposes that such mandatory vaccines are put in place in order to create future disease by poisoning the people with dangerous chemicals and DNA fragments that are knowingly added to vaccines. The poisoning of the people, it is said, will pay off in future profits for Big Pharma when those people develop other serious diseases requiring "treatment" with medications. Many people who support this theory currently believe, for example, that AIDS was engineered by human scientists and then administered to the gay population in New York in the late 1980's through vaccines.

Control the sheeple: This theory supposes that the main purpose of mandatory vaccines is to train the American public to get used to submitting to compulsory medicines. Once a certain segment of the population is targeted and effectively injected with mandatory medicines, these policies can be extended to other groups and, eventually, can encompass the entire population.

The first theory -- Financial Benefit -- is the simplest and easiest theory to believe. It requires nothing more than simple greed on the part of Big Pharma, along with the usual level of corruption at the FDA. NaturalNews believes this is the most likely explanation for events surrounding Gardasil vaccination policies, but we do not rule out other possible explanations, either.

There is no question that Merck has the lack of ethics, the willingness and the means to commit medical fraud on an unprecedented scale. Based on the information revealed in this report, the mandatory vaccination of young girls with Gardasil appears to be the boldest medical hoax yet perpetrated by the company. [continue reading]

NaturalNews believes Merck is currently engaged in a massive medical fraud, and that it has influenced, corrupted or otherwise recruited FDA officials and state health authorities in a grand scheme to sell vaccines that are at best medically worthless, and at worst medically dangerous. Halting cervical cancer seems to have nothing to do with the marketing and prescribing of Gardasil. The entire campaign push for mandatory HPV vaccinations seems to be based entirely in the realm of sales and marketing.

The "marketing" of HPV vaccines involves classic disease mongering -- spreading fear about a disease as a way of corralling patients into begging for the "solution" that just happens to be readily available from the same pharmaceutical company that promoted the disease in the first place. The hype over cervical cancer and Gardasil seems to be nothing more than a classic case of fear-based marketing designed to create such consumer fear over cervical cancer that a massive public outcry would result in legislation mandating the vaccines.

Permission is granted to reprint this article in its entirety, for any non-commercial purpose, as long as full credit is given to the author (Mike Adams) and a clearly visible clickable link is placed back to this URL at NaturalNews.com. You may also freely quote from this article with proper citation.[sources]

Related Articles

GlaxoSmithKline Accused of Conspiracy
Big Pharma Researches Pleads Guilty to Fraud
Addicting Congress

Big Pharma Researcher Pleads Guilty to Fraud

This could very well be the largest research fraud in medical history, as formerly chief of acute pain at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass and a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study the effectiveness of Celebrex pain medication in a 2005 study in which no patients were actually enrolled in 2005.

Prosecutors allege that Reuben made up the data, which he subsequently published in the medical journal 'Anesthesia and Analgesia', and has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex reduces pain during post-surgical recovery.

Dr. Scott Reuben has perpetrated one of the biggest research frauds in medical history by faking the entire study. What’s even more frightening is that the studies were actually published without any type of control or oversight.

The medical journal, 'Anesthesia and Analgesia' retracted 10 papers written by Reuben, and medical experts at the time said at least 21 journal articles by the anesthesiologist appeared to be fabricated.[read more]

Apparently, this was not the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked the data for Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.

“We are left with a large hole in our understanding of this field.  There are substantial tendrils from this body of work that reach throughout the discipline of postoperative pain management.” Steven Shafer, editor-in-chief of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Some of the studies reported favorable results from use of Pfizer’s Bextra and Merck’s Vioxx, both painkillers that have since been pulled from the market. Others offered good news about Pfizer’s pain drugs Lyrica and Celebrex and Wyeth’s antidepressant Effexor XR. Doctors said Reuben’s work was particularly influential in pain treatment and that they were shocked by the news. [read more]

After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. [read more]

Last March, Reuben was fired from his position at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Massachusetts after an audit revealed he had been making up data for over 10 years.

“In my opinion, the Big Pharma companies more than likely knew of this, and possibly sought him out for his expertise in getting faked studies published.”

READ - List of 21 Fabricated Studies by Dr. Scott Reuben

What's more notable about this story is not the fact that Reuben faked the clinical trials without patients. It's not the fact that these “scientific” medical journals published these lies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid Reuben close to half a million dollars to get their drugs pushed up to the front line for use in real patients.

The real story here is that, there really isn’t a story here, this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry.

Has the curtain been pulled back enough that you can see who is running the show?

Dr. Reuben's actions really aren't that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.

Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all.

Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction.

Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on "good science." It's all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being "woo woo" wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that's based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption.

You just have to laugh, actually, when you hear pushers of vaccines and pharmaceuticals claim their medicine is "scientific" while natural medicine is "unproven." Sure it's scientific -- about as scientific as the storyline in a Scooby Doo cartoon, or as credible as the medical license of a six-year-old kid who just received a "let's play doctor" gift set for Christmas.

Many pharmaceutical researchers would have better careers as writers of fiction novels rather than scientific papers.

For all those people who ignorantly claim that modern pharmaceutical science is based on "scientific evidence," just give them these three words: Doctor Scott Reuben. [source]

Drug companies support fraudulent research

Don't forget that the drug companies openly supported Dr. Scott Reuben's research. They paid him, in fact, to keep on fabricating studies.

The drug companies claim to be innocent in all this, but behind the scenes they had to have known what was going on. Dr. Reuben's research was just too consistently favorable to drug company interests to be scientifically legitimate. If a drug company wanted to "prove" that their drug was good for some new application, all they had to do was ask Dr. Reuben to come up with the research (wink wink). "Here's another fifty thousand dollars to study whether our drug is good for post-surgical pain (wink)."

And before long, Dr. Reuben would magically materialize a brand new study that just happened to "prove" exactly what the sponsoring drug company wanted to prove. Advocates of western medicine claim they don't believe in magic, but when it comes to clinical trials, they actually do: All the results they wish to see just magically appear as long as the right researcher gets paid to materialize the results out of thin air, much like waving a magician's wand and chanting, "Abra cadabra... let there be RESEARCH DATA!"

Shazam! The research data materializes just like that. It all gets written up into a "scientific" paper that also magically gets published in medical journals that fail to ask a single question that might exposed the research fraud.

The whole system makes a mockery of real science. It is a system operated by criminals who fabricate whatever "scientific evidence" they need in order to get published in medical journals and win FDA approval for drugs that they fully realize are killing people.[source]

What is "Evidence-Based Medicine?"

The fact that a researcher like Dr. Reuben could so successfully fabricate fraudulent study data, then get it published in peer-reviewed science journals, and get away with it for 13 years sheds all kinds of new light on what's really behind "evidence-based medicine."

The recipe for evidence-based medicine is quite simple: Fabricate the evidence! Get it published in any mainstream medical journal. Then you can quote the fabricated evidence as "fact!"

When pushers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines resort to quoting "evidence-based medicine" as their defense, keep in mind that much of their so-called evidence has been entirely fabricated. When they claim their branch of toxic chemical medicine is based on "real science," what they really mean is that it's based on fraudulent science but they've all secretly agreed to call it "real science." When they claim to have "scientific facts" supporting their position, what they really mean is that those "facts" were fabricated by criminal researchers being paid bribes by the drug companies.

"Evidence-based medicine," it turns out, hardly exists anymore. And even if it does, how do you know which studies are real vs. which ones were fabricated? If a trusted, well-paid researcher can get his falsified papers published for 13 years in top-notch science journals -- without getting caught by his peers -- then what does that say about the credibility of the entire peer-review science paper publishing process?

"Scientific medicine" is a total fraud.

And this fraud isn't limited to Dr Scott Reuben, either. Remember: he engaged in routine research fraud for 13 years before being caught. There are probably thousands of other scientists engaged in similar research fraud right now who haven't yet been caught in the act. Their fraudulent research papers have no doubt already been published in "scientific" medical journals. They've been quoted in the popular press. They've been relied on by FDA decision makers to approve drugs as "safe and effective" for widespread use.

And yet underneath all this, there's nothing more than fraud and quackery. Sure, there may be some legitimate studies mixed in with all the fraud, but how can we tell the difference?

How are we to trust this system that claims to have a monopoly on scientific truth but in reality is a front for outright scientific fraud?

What is Positive about this discovery?

So we all agree that this guy is a jerk and should be put in prison, and the key should be thrown away. 

At the same time, we must thank Dr Scott Reuben, for showing us the truth about the pharmaceutical industry, the research quackery, and the laughable "scientific" journals and the bribery and corruption that characterizes the pharmaceutical industry today.

Thank you Dr. Scott Reuben for shedding light on the true nature of the drug industry. Keep up the good work. After paying your fine and serving a little jail time, I'm sure your services will be in high demand at all the top drug companies that need yet more "scientific" studies to be fabricated and submitted to the medical journals.

You may be a dishonest, disgusting human being to most of the world, but you're a huge asset to the pharmaceutical industry and they need you back! There are more studies that need to be fabricated soon; more false papers that need to be published and more dangerous drugs that need to receive FDA approval. Hurry!

Because if there's one place that extreme dishonesty is richly rewarded, it's in the pharmaceutical industry, where poisons are approved as medicines and fiction is published as the truth.[source]

Are we beginning to Arise from the Illusion, yet?

Related Articles

GenerationRx
Addicting Congress
Monsanto, US Drug War and Round Up Pesticide
Bayer Exposed (HIV Contaminated Vaccine)
Making a Killing, the Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging

Sources--

Theday.com  Associated Press/NBC Connecticut  United States Attorney’s Office  MedPage Today Natural News