End of time. End of the world. The end of Mayan Long Count. The apocalypse. The end of Kali Yuga.
How can one adapt to what one is not even conscious of?
The adaptation to personal beliefs is not an adaptation but a dead end road. The sustainability of life corresponds to its adaptation to the impersonal truth. Life must be just to be justified by its environment and the justice must be impersonal to be equal for all.
Can a father be just if he favors only one of his many sons?
Is it of any use to keep something that is useless?
One cannot be of use to oneself but only to that that is outside of oneself. The purpose of a rudder is to steer the boat - it has no value if detached and on its own.
What is the use of an unjust and selfish world, because it has no creative power?
What is the use of a purposeless existence?
Does it have the power to sustain itself when faced with its purpose?
Can one offer a purpose in exchange for a given life?
Can one repent the injustice fostered by the partiality of beliefs and accept the justice of truth?
Can one adapt and justify his continued existence?
Or is one's heart too inflexible and too heavy with the injustice?
Apocalyptic 42-day passage of earth though a black hole of time that will start with winter sun of 2012 requires the clarity and justice of all life on earth. Why? Because only the justice is coherent; hence only the justice has a creative power of life. The injustice is incoherent randomness that is devoid of any power because all its selfish and isolated parts act against each other. The justice is not optional. It is the very essence of life. Life feeds on it.
The world offers you life, yet you are paralyzed with the terror thinking that life is death and that death is life, but of which - are illusions.
Remember, it is an impersonal message - it doesn't matter whether you accept or reject it. It does not matter whether you see it as the fear mongering or as the love and concern for preservation of the fellow man. All that matters is the effect. All that matters is the action. If the love will lull you into inaction but the fear will stir you into action, let it be the fear, but if the fear will paralyze you into inaction; let it be the love, since love and fear are two personal faces of an impersonal truth. The heaven knows better than what we believe to be the love or the fear. The heaven knows that the true love is a just love and that an unjust love has the same purpose as an unjust fear. The rest of the text on this page is a preparation for what is to follow and unless one mastered it in its impersonal form, there would be little benefit of proceeding to the other pages. The truth is quantized in hierarchical sequences - it evolves step by step and one can proceed to the next step only if he is firmly footed on the previous step. Confusion will replace the understanding unless this advice is followed. One will stumble trying to manage several steps at once. It will become an obstacle for the next step thus defeating its purpose unless the step before is mastered.
The wisdom and understanding are the shadows of ignorance and confusion and vice versa because the perception is dual and one exist only in contrast of its opposite. One is purpose of another and they co-exist as two intertwined partial beliefs of only one truth. One learns only through its opposite, because it is its purpose. One succeeds through the failures and fails through the successes. One prevails by surrendering and surrenders by prevailing. One lives only if supported by death and dies only if supported by life. One cannot exist separately from its opposite. One cannot exist without a purpose; hence one cannot exist separately from an environment, which is supporting him. One cannot exist in a selfish isolation from the world and the higher consciousness, which is projecting it because one is the purpose and the future of the world and its higher consciousness but only if the world and attainment of the higher consciousness is also one's purpose and one's future. The justice must be served because it's the stuff the building blocks of life are made of. Only the decay and death will prevail in the absence of justice - the decay and death on which the life feeds because life coheres what is incoherent, unifies what is separated, orders what is random and justifies what is unjust.
How can anyone dare to interpret the Mayan end date if they haven't got a clue what kind of knowledge they had?
How can one interpret something that one has no understanding of?
How can one figure out their calendars or the correlation between the astronomical cycles and the creative cycles of earth they imply, without knowing what they knew?
If you do not understand the process than at least accept its honest results.
Isn't the purpose to deceive one's heart when an end is interpreted as not really an end?
Isn't the purpose to justify personal fears when the theories are put forward, in which the finality of the present order on 21.12.2012 is not really final?
Is the suppression of truth beyond a layer of deceit not the purpose when a non-negotiable certainty is made to appear as a mere possibility?
How can one justly interpret such superior knowledge with such vastly inferior tools of modern science?
Shouldn't one backtrack his misguided efforts and try to justify the modern age from a Mayan perspective rather than vice versa.
How can the present savagery and spiritual barbarism do justice to the past refinement of thought?
Is a cave man in a position to justify the refinements of French cuisine or the intricacies of game of chess?
Why should it be presumed that a later age is somehow more advanced then the one before when the history clearly shows that an evolution is a two-way street and that reversals are just as often as are advances?
Doesn't the law of relativity, which we should have digested by now, equalize both possibilities?
Doesn't such an arrogant attitude disguises an underlying ignorance and projects the fear as a valid belief?
Is it an honest interpretation serving justice to the wisdom of Maya or to the present age?
An end that's not an end is a complete distortion of truth - it's a belief driven to a point of insanity. It is the suicidal use of a sword intended for the defensive purpose. Such insane interpretations do not clarify but obscure. They serve no justice.
How can one observe something that is beyond the means of physical observations?
What will take the precedence - a personal belief or an everlasting impersonal truth?
12.21.2012 is the end not of one but of two recursive cycles. It means exactly that - the end, two times over! The end of an astronomical cycle of the universe is the end of a creative cycle on earth since the time below is a holographic shadow of the space above. There is no mystery here. It is the end of the world, as we know it. Earth will tremble, shake and rip open along all its latent and patent faults. It will be scorched from below and from above.
Do you believe your TV or a microwave oven to be real?
Is there any doubt that a tree is a tree?
Is the reality a set of incoherent and uncertain possibilities or a set of coherent certainties?
Is it both?
It is what it is. It attains different shades only in different personal interpretations, depending on the purpose of every certain appearance. If there is no doubt that your TV, a mobile phone or your PC function immaculately, why should you doubt that the winter solstice 2012 is anything else but the end of the world, as we know it? The end of the present order in 2012 and the functioning of your electronic gadgets are the effects of the same cause. They are the inevitable outcomes of the quantum law of succession. Moreover, the entire existence is liable to the universality of the quantum laws. The end on the winter solstice is an outcome of the quantum physics.
Every finite manifestation and form of this world testifies to the universality of the quantum laws. Everything that has a finite size or a finite duration acts as a confirmation of the validity of quantum laws. An abstract law cannot be limited by its particular appearances. If the quantum law works for the microcosm, and we know that it does, than it must be applicable across the board. It is not the law of an atom but the universal law, because an atom is made of the same space and time as the universe. The difference is only relative, which is the difference in scale - the brief moment of time in a small space will acts as a long period of time in a large space.
How can the universal and absolute law be somehow limited by the relative quantities such as size, motion or density, because such relative quantities depend directly on universality of such law?
The quantum law and relativity (as well as any other law) are universal and valid across the board, regardless of the relative physicality of the particular form or manifestation, as the Maya and all the ancients knew only too well - even if they have different names for them commonly translated "as above so below" or "as in heaven so on earth".
Who is a primitive savage then and who is a sophisticated savant?
Who is the master and who is the servant here?
Who is to judge whom?
Are we going to judge the wisdom of the ancients or are they going to pass a judgment over us?
Their so-called "prophecies", about which we have no idea where they come from and what do they mean, testify that it is ancients of long forgotten past who will pass judgment over us and not vice versa, however we would like to believe otherwise. Our knowledge and technology might have a broader applicability but at the cost of its materialistic shallowness. In contrast, the ancient knowledge was the more selective but it run much deeper. Although their technology was less widespread, it was based on a more potent energy than the present technology. It is ancients of long forgotten past that reached the stars, not us.
What is the precession but the gradual negation (reversal) of orbital or rotation?
What is the precession but the duration of time, which is limitation of time?
The precession is time of time or an accelerated time (gravity); hence a shadow below of 4D (solar) space above, because double time is space just as double negation is affirmation. The precession is the limitation that slices the linear flow of time into discrete units (quanta) with precisely determined points of beginning and end of each quantum state or each relative incarnation of orbiting particle. It is the quantum of the surrounding solar space (4D) doubling as the time period of the embedded Earth (3D). The quantum of solar space or alternatively the duration of the present time is precession, because the smallest unit of 4D spacetime is (just as the smallest unit of subsequent 5D and 6D cosmic densities is 1/5 and 1/6 thus determining yet larger cycles of time).
Ultimately, all is connected with everything else in a perfectly balanced reality (holography). An appearance denied its cause or its effects is a shallow materialistic illusion denied its deeper meaning. Spatial discrepancy leading to the gradual shift of the cardinal points is the effect of the same underlying cause (fractality), regardless of its relative scale. It is the result of the perpetual gravitational tug of war between two successive dense bodies in their mutual yin/yang embrace, where one supports another through resistance (inertia) thus creating the spiraling flower of life. If anything, such slight asymmetry confirms rather then disproves the true alignment and its inevitable consequence - a quantum leap and an unavoidable gravitational change of the earth's environment.
How much is enough?
How many tsunamis, who many eruptions, how many earthquakes, how many storms, how much of disintegrating climatic pattern or how much of disintegrating electromagnetic shield?
How much violence, how much starvation, how many diseases and wars will be enough to wake the man from his slumber?
Can anyone in his right mind think that the course of events can continue in the present spiral of decay without a drastic and fundamental change?
Believe what you want, but are you ready to face your beliefs or disbeliefs in the moment of truth?
Perhaps, you believe there is no truth.
Are you ready to bear the consequence?
Are you ready to reap what you sow?
Are you ready for the justice to be served according to your own standards?
This is not yet another theory competing for dominance. It is the moment of truth. Act now or bear the consequence of your inaction. Soon the events will overtake the opportunity to make the amends. Soon a certainty will overshadow all the relative and temporary possibilities. Soon a freedom of choice will be replaced by inevitability of only one choice - to be or not to be. You life is your personal responsibility. It is not the responsibility of your government, the Pope in Rome, the Dalai Lama or your neighborhood shaman. It is not the responsibility of your parents, your spouse, your employer or your spiritual guide.
It is an illusion of a fatherless son in which an effect appears without a cause and a cause appears without its effects. In the partial framework of existence the causal (karmic) bonds are interrupted by the personal selfishness generating a circular development. Such existence will end unless the causal bond between man and the environment supporting it are mended before its limited (relative or temporary) option expires 12/21.2012. It is not enough to be a potential. Potential must be realized. It is not enough to exist as a mere possibility of the new world order without reaching for the option to become its certainty.
One without another is a purposeless appearance in which the causal thread is broken and such an illusion must end just as it has begun.
Did not you know that the new world could rise only from the ashes of the old one?
How can a new house be erected unless the old house is dispensed with?
How can one adorn the new garment over the old one?
Even the snake must periodically change its skin not to be suffocated by the overgrown one. You who believe in the ascendancy of spirit, forgetting that the spirit can perceive and express itself only through the bodily senses, are you prepared to face the weight of your beliefs.
Isn't the fear induced by the thought of physical destruction a reaction of your own core disbelief?
You who speak of love, is your love strong enough to overcome your underlying fear in the moment of truth?
God doesn't care what you believe.
Words alone have no purpose.
Can you light the fire by talking about it?
Can you reach the stars by looking at them?
Can you have a child by thinking about it?
Grow up. Wake up. Overcome the purposeless appearance to gain an eternal life. Fulfill the purpose of your creation. Creator creates through his creation. Be a creator and not a destroyer, because a creator is created and a destroyer is destroyed when the time is up. Coherent truth amplifies and creates life while incoherence of the selfish and separated beliefs leads to randomness and death. The only outcome of inactivity is decay. Creation and coherence of life is possible only by the conscious effort. One is responsible for the creation of one's own life through coherence with the higher will. One can be born only through a father. One can never give a birth to oneself; hence one cannot know the truth through a selfish thought and a personal belief but only through the impersonal thought of his creator. Intuition without a conscious knowledge, just as a consciousness without the intuitive truth is a deceitful half-truth. Such belief must be surmounted in the interest of preservation of life, which is the purpose of creation, and also the purpose of man. What is given has the use only if it is accepted too. The one lacking the support of its opposite must eventually collapse under its own weight.
Is it any different with your random beliefs and half-baked theories, where everyone is fostering one's own direction of thought irrespective of the fundamental pattern supporting all of them?
Isn't a belief only an appearance, when denied its rightful purpose?
What is the use of a spanner if one forgot what is it for?
Can one exist separated from the environment supporting it?
Can a tree grow without the roots firmly planted in the ground?
Can the beliefs exist without the support of underlying truth?
The one can walk anywhere he chooses, but can one walk denied the support of earth under his feet?
The consequences of walking in the clouds are obvious. The end result of many incoherent beliefs is a complete confusion and absence of any underlying truth.
But is that a true picture of the world?
World is a causal duality in which every effect has a cause and every appearance has a purpose; hence even incoherence of shattered beliefs has a reaction of an underlying coherent truth supporting all of them. See beyond the appearance. See beyond the horizons of your personal beliefs - but before they lapse with the winter sun of 2012, because it is too late to act once a hungry lion pounces on top of you.
Christ said, "you can see the kingdom of my father only through me."
Doesn't it mean that one needs to follow the explicit outer guidance rather than the unreliable inner belief?
The road is always a narrow path cut through the vast field.
Do you think he said you must worship him as a person or you must accept his message as the truth beyond and above all the personal beliefs?
Is that statement and the message any different than a message contained in one or another form in all the past and present religions?
It is a destruction and cataclysm beyond all your imagination and yet only such destruction will cleanse the world of its accumulated negative karma of the materialistic and selfish existence. The cataclysmic end of an astronomical cycle as seen in the quantum leap of an orbiting electron only on a grand scale is not a theory or a personal belief but an impersonal truth. Such destruction on a large scale is the very fountain of life on the small scale just as the similar destructions on the smaller scales are the very fountain of life on a large scale.
The truth is the very negation of all your beliefs. The truth is what remains when all the beliefs and all the disbeliefs are taken out an appearance. You can either believe it or you can know it. You have a choice to desist from the interpretations and accept the facts in all their honesty or to twist them to fit your personal moulds. The consequence will be commensurate with your choice, because your future depends on your present actions. It doesn't truly matter if you accept facts by believing in their honesty or you choose to dig for deeper truth.[source]